Social policy priority areas
1. Comprehensive Support and Reintegration of Crisis-Affected Populations
Objective: to ensure psychological, social, professional, and economic recovery of veterans, internally displaced persons (IDPs), civilians, and their families.
Key Areas of Activity:
- psychological and psychosocial support;
- PTSD rehabilitation programs;
- career adaptation;
- reskilling and retraining;
- social counselling;
- reintegration support services.
2. Educational and Scientific Reintegration & Human Capital Development
Objective: to restore educational pathways and enhance professional capacity.
Key Areas:
- fast-track education programs;
- dual education models;
- interdisciplinary courses;
- professional development and upskilling;
- applied research.
3. Community-Based Social Projects and Social Cohesion
Objective: to rebuild social capital and trust within communities.
Key Areas:
- integration hubs;
- community labs;
- veteran clubs;
- adaptive sports programs;
- volunteer platforms.
4. Cultural and Humanitarian Recovery & Identity
Objective: to preserve memory, support self-expression, and foster cultural reflection.
Key Areas:
- documentation of war experiences;
- publishing initiatives and series;
- art therapy;
- multimedia projects.
5. Digital Social Transformation and Innovation
Objective: to scale support through technology-driven solutions.
Key Areas:
- eMental Health services;
- Digital University initiatives;
- Career Development Center;
- social platforms;
- AI-enabled support systems.
6. Family-Oriented Support
Objective: to strengthen families as the foundation of social stability.
Key Areas:
- family counselling;
- parental resilience programs;
- children’s camps;
- crisis support groups.
7. Rehabilitation, Sports, and Inclusive Initiatives
Objective: to create a sustainable environment for physical and psychosocial recovery.
Key Areas:
- rehabilitation spaces;
- adaptive sports;
- physical therapy;
- inclusive environments.
Systemic Impact
✔ cross-faculty synergy;
✔ reduced fragmentation of services;
✔ increased program effectiveness;
✔ enhanced donor confidence;
✔ development of a national model of a recovery-oriented university.